Limited preview – Methodical Bible Study: A New Approach to Hermeneutics · Robert Angelo Traina Snippet view – Methodical Bible Study: A New. METHODICAL. BIBLE STUDY. A New Approach to Hermeneutics by. ROBERT A. TRAINA, S.T.M., PH.D. DEAN. ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. “. Methodical Bible Study has ratings and 20 reviews. Rod said: This book isn’t for everyone. I first read it in seminary and found it quite engaging. I.
|Published (Last):||25 January 2017|
|PDF File Size:||18.62 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.5 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It should be robert traina methodical bible studycovering the whole Bible. Dec 09, John Crowe rated it really liked it. When you ask lots of questions, some of bibel will seem unimportant. Mar 26, Brian White rated it it was amazing. There are two main approaches open to the Bible student.
Many prophecies in the Bible are fulfilled over and over. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Traina, observation should be made in four areas: To generate answers, we draw robert traina methodical bible study many different resources.
It should be psychological ; one must try to understand the mind of the author.
A great movie makes you think. After a while, he brought out another fish, and then another.
Keep an open mind. Treating the Bible as just a history book. Sign In Desktop Site. Jun 15, Peter Krol rated it it was amazing. Salim Haynes rated it it was amazing Dec 04, In the past, psychologists used something called the Rorschach inkblot roberrt. Agassiz to tell him what robert traina methodical bible study had learned.
Methodical Bible Study
Write Your Own Review Only registered users can write reviews. Apr 02, Rod rated it it was amazing. From where does this knowledge or basis come? This one will stay on the shelf for future reference. There are two main approaches open to the Bible student.
(This presentation is based on Methodical Bible Study by Robert A
Perhaps God intentionally wrote it that way to keep us from thinking that we figured it all out. It would be wrong to interpret the Old Testament as if it were complete, or to interpret the New Testament as if it came first. Think about what the limitations might be. But it ignores the fact that many parts of the Bible were intended by the authors to be figurative, e. How can light and darkness coexist? This is especially important in evaluating the writings of Paul. Robert traina methodical bible study an approach is sound because, being objective, it corresponds to the objective nature of the Scriptures.
But these points are extracted through a process of evaluation. Traina summarizes its success in this comment: Notice the links or bridges between units that imply logical relations. Observation is to notice what the passage actually says. How can the Word be with God and God at the same robert traina methodical bible study Once we have properly interpreted a passage evaluated the relevance of the specific teachings, the application will naturally follow.
The professor returned and asked him what he saw, and he recited a number of facts. In Methodical Bible Study p. This is the book that Dr.
Verse 3 says that the world was made through him rather than by him. What is the subject?
Methodical Bible Study
There is too much discontinuity between the two testaments in the author’s view perhaps. A literal term retains its usual meaning, whereas a figurative term is symbolic. After observation comes interpretation.
The main text is the Bible itself, not commentaries or books robert traina methodical bible study the Bible. Inductive study is the best way to approach and handle the Bible with respect as the word of God. If two or more things are presented as similar or different, in what ways are they similar or different?