ASME B31G 2012 PDF

ASME B31G (Revision of ASME B31G). Manual for. Determining the. Remaining Strength of. Corroded Pipelines Supplement to ASME B31 Code for. 2 Feb Integration with NDT tools. ▫ 3D surface measurements. ▫ UT. ▫ What’s next? ▫ Pit gage data entry interface. ▫ ASME B31G (), DNV RP-F Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines. Houston Section. April 10, 4. Introduction. • Pipeline Design. • ASME B31G. • Limits for B31G. • Misc.

Author: Torn Tugul
Country: Senegal
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 9 October 2005
Pages: 459
PDF File Size: 4.23 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.56 Mb
ISBN: 329-5-80759-966-4
Downloads: 38973
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tetilar

They provide a ready reference of maximum corrosion lengths for a range of pipe sizes and depths of corrosion. ASME issues written replies to inquiries concerning interpretations of technical aspects of this Manual.

If spaced sufficiently closely, the metal loss areas may interact asme b31g 2012 as to result asme b31g 2012 failure at a lower pressure than would be expected based on an analysis of the separate flaws. Locate the table corresponding to the size of the pipe, D.

ASME procedures provide for reconsideration 202 any interpretation when or if additional information that might affect an interpretation is available. b1g

Popular Publishers

Thank you for interesting in our services. Page Location Change 2 1.

These replies are taken verbatim from the original letters, except for a asme b31g 2012 typographical and editorial asme b31g 2012 made for the purpose of improved clarity. B13g technical inquiries must be submitted in writing to the staff secretary. Cite the applicable paragraph number s and the topic of the inquiry. Please copy and paste this embed script to where you want to embed Embed Script.

The following document summarizes the results of burst tests and service failures of line qsme asme b31g 2012 by corrosion or artificial metal loss, and which have previously been used for the purpose of validating the evaluation methods presented herein: Depth, d, mm 0.


Define an asme b31g 2012 safety factor, SF. It is not a property specified in a material grade or finished product standard. A Level 2 evaluation may be suitable for use in prioritizing metal-loss anomalies identified by high-resolution inline inspection. For consistency in comparison to results obtained from evaluations performed to an earlier edition, use of the same definition for flow stress is recommended.

The local solution resulting in the lowest calculated failure stress shall govern.

The user asme b31g 2012 consider referring to applicable sources as necessary in order to best implement a given method. In establishing the safety factor for a given pipeline segment, the pipeline operator shall asme b31g 2012 consideration to the accuracy of corrosion depth and length measurements, rates asm corrosion growth, the characteristics of the pipe, the reliability of surge control or excess pressure limiting methods, and the presence of external factors that affect risk.

Read across to the column showing the wall thickness of the pipe. Noninteracting flaws should be evaluated as separate flaws.

Subsequent revisions to the Manual may have asme b31g 2012 the reply. Subsequently, an effort was undertaken to update the B31G document to recognize certain other corrosion evaluation methods that have proven sound and that have seen successful use in the pipeline industry. If the helical pattern lies at an angle 22012 than 45 deg to the pipe axis, the overall length asme b31g 2012 the corroded area indicated as L1 in Fig.

The Committee welcomes proposals for revisions to this Standard.

Where more than one definition applies, the various definitions produce asme b31g 2012 though not necessarily identical results when used with any given evaluation method. Depth, d, mm 8. Holbrook, Babcock Power, Inc. Incorporation of these other methods into a recognized Code document provides the pipeline operator or other user with a formalized framework within which to use such methodologies, as well as a wider range of codified technical options with which to make an evaluation.

TOP 10 Related  ASTM E1527-05 EBOOK DOWNLOAD

Cases may be issued for the purpose of providing alternative rules when justified, to permit early implementation of an approved revision when the need asme b31g 2012 urgent, or to provide asme b31g 2012 not covered by existing provisions.

It is intended that a Level 0 evaluation be conducted in the field without the need for performing detailed calculations. Determine applicable pipe material properties from appropriate records. Campbell, Air Liquide J.

It is not the intention of this document to prohibit their use, but the user of such methods shall asme b31g 2012 able to demonstrate that the objective of a asme b31g 2012 and reliable assessment of metal loss can be achieved. When evaluating anomalies identified by inline inspection, use of larger factors of safety will result in smaller flaws being left in service following field investigation and pipeline repairs.

Asme b31g download

Upon request, the B31 Standards Committee will render an interpretation of any asme b31g 2012 of the Standard. Errata to asmme and standards may be posted on the ASME Web site under the Committee Pages to provide corrections to incorrectly published items, or to correct typographical or grammatical errors in codes and standards.

Phrase the question as a request for an interpretation of a specific requirement suitable for general understanding asme b31g 2012 use, not as a request for an approval of a proprietary design or situation. Additional procedures for inquiries may be listed within. In these cases, a revised reply bearing the original interpretation number with the asme b31g 2012 R is presented. Not all methods give identical numerical results or consistent degrees of conservatism.